This is a scan of a sample store built from Findwise's own test pages, not a customer. The scores and findings are exactly what the scanner produced for those pages.

How Findwise scores a store

Example AI shopping readiness report for a sample store

Quick scan · 8 pages read · 2 addressable gaps · 32 buyer prompts estimated · 2026-09-05 · Confidence: High

Score 78 out of 100, Contender

Contender, visible fixes remain

Sample Store looks mostly ready for AI-assisted buyers; the biggest gap we found is detail on its product pages.

We parsed 8 pages (1 home, 2 product, 1 collection, 1 comparison, 1 support, 1 policy, 1 about). Crawlability is your strongest area; Answer snippets needs the most work. 2 addressable gaps affect Brand discovery, Product advice, Comparison prompts and Support questions. Priority is high because of 1 high-severity finding, “One of the 2 product pages we read appears to leave out who the product is for”.

Contender tier. High priority. High confidence; 1 limitation noted.

  • Contender
  • High priority
  • Crawlability 100

Where the buyer journey holds, and where it leaks

  1. FindableCrawlability
  2. ReadableStructured data
  3. ConvincingPDP detail
  4. ComparableComparison coverage
  5. TrustedTrust signals
  6. QuotableAnswer snippetsLeaking here

The four weakest areas

Ordered by score, weakest first; a category with too little evidence to score comes last.

Quick scan
  • Answer snippetsSome answers are quotable, but much of the content is long-form only.
    59/100
  • PDP detailThe product pages we read leave some buyer questions unanswered; a finding in this report shows which.
    69/100
  • Comparison coverageThere is some help choosing between options, but not enough to answer most comparison questions.
    78/100
  • Trust signalsSome proof is present, but ratings or policies are hard to read in places.
    79/100

Lead finding

The finding this preview leads with, and the fix to make first.

2 addressable gaps
High

One of the 2 product pages we read appears to leave out who the product is for

One of the 2 product pages we read appears to leave out what the product is for, so it cannot be matched to the needs shoppers describe.

Evidence scope

Seen on 1 product page

Medium confidence · Merchandising

What to fix first

Add a line to each product page naming the situations the product is built for — the activity, the season, the kind of day — in the words a shopper would use rather than an internal category name.

Buyer moment at risk

Sample Store alternatives

To answer this from your own pages, an automated shopper needs a buying guide of your own. We did not find it in the pages we read.

Template answer, not a live AI response

More findings

The free report shows the available depth without exposing paid evidence.

3 more findings in the full report

See every finding in priority order, with its evidence and recommended fix.

Estimated answer readiness

How well the store's pages answer buyer questions

32 buyer prompts estimated from the pages Findwise could read.

4 groups

Estimated prompt coverage

Brand discovery100Estimated across 8 prompts
Product advice93Estimated across 8 prompts
Comparison prompts88Estimated across 8 prompts
Support questions100Estimated across 8 prompts
Prompt-by-prompt matrixLocked

Buyer questions

The questions that expose the store's strongest and weakest evidence

One buyer moment is visible. Detailed prompt evidence remains protected.

1 preview
  • Buyer moment that leaksSample Store alternatives

    To answer this from your own pages, an automated shopper needs a buying guide of your own. We did not find it in the pages we read.

    Template answer, not a live AI response
    Comparison promptsMedium
Prompt-by-prompt matrixLocked

Evidence & sources

Which pages offer citeable buying evidence

The free preview summarizes citation readiness. Exact page evidence stays protected.

locked
  • Answer snippets

    Some answers are quotable, but much of the content is long-form only.

    59/100
  • Trust signals

    Some proof is present, but ratings or policies are hard to read in places.

    79/100
Page-level evidenceLocked

Comparison readiness

How the store handles a comparison question

Comparison readiness comes from this store's pages. Findwise did not crawl or score any competitor.

  • Comparison coverage

    There is some help choosing between options, but not enough to answer most comparison questions.

    78/100

Technical site readiness

The public-site signals Findwise could evaluate

Whether pages can be reached and whether their facts are machine-readable.

8 pages

Category scores

  • Crawlability

    Automated readers can reach the pages we read without being turned away.

    100/100
  • Structured data

    The product pages we read publish machine-readable facts that an assistant can quote directly.

    86/100
  • PDP detail

    The product pages we read leave some buyer questions unanswered; a finding in this report shows which.

    69/100

Scan notes

  • Buyer-prompt estimates use rule-based coverage for this scan.
Crawled URL listLocked

Action plan

Your first fix

The most important finding this scan made, and the change to make first. The full report lists every finding in priority order. Recommendations are suggestions. They are not a promise of ranking, traffic, or sales.

3 locked
  1. High

    One of the 2 product pages we read appears to leave out who the product is for

    Merchandising fix · Medium confidence

    One of the 2 product pages we read appears to leave out what the product is for, so it cannot be matched to the needs shoppers describe.

    Evidence scope

    Seen on 1 product page

    Recommended

    Add a line to each product page naming the situations the product is built for — the activity, the season, the kind of day — in the words a shopper would use rather than an internal category name.

3 more findings in the full report

See every finding in priority order, with its evidence and recommended fix.

Full issue listLocked

Progress & verification

Report history

Report history is real only once a second report of the same store exists.

Before and after

Report history follows a store you own.

Each fresh report of your store adds a line of history, so score movement, new findings and regressions are real rather than fabricated.

Scan your store free

See pricing

Based on the public pages Findwise could access at scan time.

Findwise does not test AI assistants directly; coverage is estimated from your pages.

AI shopping readiness is Findwise's own scoring framework, not a certification by any AI provider.

Scoring version 0.11.3